My first CSP layout was featured in the January 2015 issue of Railroad Model Craftsman, and what I’m going to present here is shortened version of that article. That issue is sold out at White River Productions, so if you have questions about this now-dismantled layout, let me know in the comment section.
The Camas Prairie Railroad and model railroad layouts based on it have been featured in numerous articles in the model railroad and railfan press. Even though much has been written about the line, and even though I grew up in Grangeville, Idaho, the terminus of the road’s Second Subdivision, I did not originally set out to model it. Instead, I was focused on modeling a generic or freelanced Burlington Northern secondary mainline with a connecting Union Pacific branch line set in the PNW during late 1980s or early 1990s. This would allow me to “cherry pick” the operations and traffic that I found interesting. When my family and I moved into a new house in 1998, I finally had enough space for a small- to medium-sized HO-scale layout, and I began planning. Having studied layout design for years, I came up with a reasonable track plan that included a mainline loop, a short branch line, and some staging.
As I started construction, I began to have some misgivings about the layout. Influenced by articles about prototype modeling and my own experiences trackside, I found that I was becoming less comfortable with my freelanced BN/UP concept. I also realized that building or buying enough rolling stock for unit trains and stack trains that would only pass through the layout as bridge traffic was not how I wanted to spend my time and money. I began to cast about for a secondary line with the appropriate traffic to serve as a prototype. I realized that most of what I wanted could be found on the Camas Prairie Railroad. It had the right combination of agricultural and timber industries, operated with an intriguing mix of rolling stock, and had both the BN and UP presences that I desired.
Traffic on the CSP had declined in the 1980s, so I decided that a setting in the mid-1970s would best meet my needs. This era would also provide an interesting mix of new and old freight cars. I found that I needed more information about the CSP in the 1970s, so I set up an internet discussion group dedicated to the CSP in hopes of reaching out to some CSP authors and modelers. I was quite surprised by the worldwide response to the group, and I made numerous, valuable contacts and friendships with other modelers, railfans, and professional railroaders. The knowledge that the members of the group shared was the key in developing both the track plan and the operational plan for the layout.
The Camas Prairie Railroad was a 260-mile system with several branches, and obviously I could not duplicate the entire railroad in my available 15 x 17 ft. basement room. I decided that I wanted to focus on a single branch and a base of operations. The prototype CSP had two operational centers, East Lewiston and Orofino, and four subdivisions. I chose to model part of the Second Subdivision, the line that ascends the famous Lapwai Canyon and serves the Camas Prairie itself, not because of the fabulous scenery and fantastic wooden trestles, but because of the mix of agricultural and timber industry shippers found there.
The actual Second Sub served eight towns, but I found that I had space to represent only two. I chose the two largest towns, Craigmont and Grangeville, Idaho. These towns had rail-served grain elevators, fertilizer dealers, and sawmills, resulting in an appealing mix of traffic. In addition, the CSP connected with the Nezperce Railroad at Craigmont, which was still handling grain in 40-ft boxcars during the mid-1970s. By having these two towns and the Nezperce interchange, I could represent the line’s traffic mix and use realistic freight car blocking in the branch trains. The choice to model the Second Sub dictated that East Lewiston be my base of operations since the Second Sub trains originated there. East Lewiston and nearby Lewiston also offered interesting industries, including the Potlatch Forests Inc. (PFI) sawmill and paper mill complex and a complete locomotive terminal.
The best way to capture the essence of the CSP operations in my limited space appeared to be duplicating, as closely as possible, actual track arrangements to produce a “layout design element” for each of several scenes or vignettes. I was able to include four relatively complete scenes in the layout, but I did not have room for open running between them. Personal visits confirmed track layouts, and members of the internet group provided track diagrams for places that I couldn’t view up close, like the yard throat at East Lewiston and the Potlatch mill complex.
I built open grid, sectional benchwork that closely resembles David Barrow’s “domino” system. I made each unit either 30 x 48 inches or 20 by 48 inches, but I deviated from David’s method by putting legs only on every other domino. I simply bolted the intermediate sections without legs to those with legs. I also did not always match the joints in the sub roadbed with the edges of the dominos. I made the dominos with 3-inch wide framing pieces cut from ¾-inch ACX plywood and used ½-inch or ¾-inch plywood for the sub roadbed, depending on the distance spanned or what I had on hand at the time. I used a mixture of Atlas code 83 and Micro Engineering code 55, 70, and 83 flextrack and turnouts.
By making some compromises and focusing on key aspects of the CSP, I was able to develop a workable track plan. Once the benchwork was completed and the track in place, I began having operating sessions with a few friends. We found that traffic mix and the prototype track arrangements made the layout realistic and fun to operate. After operating the layout for a couple of years with some placeholder structures, my wife and I had the opportunity to build-on to our house to create a larger layout space, so in spite of the layout being very successful, I reluctantly decided to dismantle it prior to building any scenery.


